<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Finance Shop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financeshop.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financeshop.info</link>
	<description>Finance Information and Insight Like You've Never Seen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Can a finance company have my tax return garnished or taken away? by Won</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Won</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>It is a problem in a matter of law.
You should turn to your laywer for professional advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a problem in a matter of law.<br />
You should turn to your laywer for professional advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can a finance company have my tax return garnished or taken away? by The</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>i try to write the answers your problem in my blog you can see any problem in my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i try to write the answers your problem in my blog you can see any problem in my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do conservative explain the failure of the housing market &amp; banking system during Bush presidency? by Mike W</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>It would be unreasonable to blame the housing crash on one person, or even one administration.  The housing crash was a chain reaction.  People defaulted on their mortgages, which drove down the value of other homes to the point that their mortgage was for more than the value of their home.  They defaulted, driving the value down even further, which caused more people to default.  Banks were being pressured to provide mortgages to low income families, and they were approved for more than they should have been.  Interest rates were too low, the Fed should have been raising interest rates to slow things down, but they didn&#039;t.   Everyone in key decision making positions fell asleep at the helm, and didn&#039;t notice that the ship was headed straight into the rocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be unreasonable to blame the housing crash on one person, or even one administration.  The housing crash was a chain reaction.  People defaulted on their mortgages, which drove down the value of other homes to the point that their mortgage was for more than the value of their home.  They defaulted, driving the value down even further, which caused more people to default.  Banks were being pressured to provide mortgages to low income families, and they were approved for more than they should have been.  Interest rates were too low, the Fed should have been raising interest rates to slow things down, but they didn&#8217;t.   Everyone in key decision making positions fell asleep at the helm, and didn&#8217;t notice that the ship was headed straight into the rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do conservative explain the failure of the housing market &amp; banking system during Bush presidency? by Call Me Bwana</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Call Me Bwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>They weren&#039;t a failure of the free market, because they were caused by conditions created by government that distorted the market.

It started with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1993, which gave the government the power to punish banks that did not meet their goals of loans to minorities. To meet these goals, banks were forced to issue higher risk loans than they had previously deemed wise.

Then, to offset that risk, the derivative investment devices were created. But since the risk was inherently unknown (government had never forced high risk loans to be made before), those investments themselves were risky.

But the government (pushed by Democrat political operatives running Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) also opened those government-sponsored entities (they keep profits, but the US taxpayer takes the risks) to purchase a bunch of these risky papers.

In the course of having created these derivatives for the government-mandated risky lending, financial firms found that it could be lucrative to offer similar risky loans and play in the derivatives market with non-poor people. And with Fannie and Freddie buying paper to the tune of trillions, the money flow kept on going.

As time went, real estate prices soared, and with the Fed loaning money out at low interest rates (supported by Bush and his &quot;ownership society&quot; policy), that created a real estate pricing bubble.

And when people started noticing this was a bad thing, it was Democrats who were able to prevent the GOP from making changes, because the GOP only had a small majority in the Senate, and a slightly larger majority in the House. And Democrats like Dodd and Frank, who had very cosy relationships with the banking industry, prevented any action that could have tempered the coming realignment by addressing it sooner.

So, it is pure, unfettered ignorance to simply blame it on Bush, or even wholly on the Democrats.

The problem was caused by government intervention into the market, which caused a significant distortion of risk, and fueled by bad Fed policy caused an unstable bubble that when it popped, ravaged the financial sector of the economy. And that had a very large ripple effect over the rest of the economy.

So, this is the type of occurrence we refer to when we conservatives say that government is the problem, not the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#8217;t a failure of the free market, because they were caused by conditions created by government that distorted the market.</p>
<p>It started with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1993, which gave the government the power to punish banks that did not meet their goals of loans to minorities. To meet these goals, banks were forced to issue higher risk loans than they had previously deemed wise.</p>
<p>Then, to offset that risk, the derivative investment devices were created. But since the risk was inherently unknown (government had never forced high risk loans to be made before), those investments themselves were risky.</p>
<p>But the government (pushed by Democrat political operatives running Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) also opened those government-sponsored entities (they keep profits, but the US taxpayer takes the risks) to purchase a bunch of these risky papers.</p>
<p>In the course of having created these derivatives for the government-mandated risky lending, financial firms found that it could be lucrative to offer similar risky loans and play in the derivatives market with non-poor people. And with Fannie and Freddie buying paper to the tune of trillions, the money flow kept on going.</p>
<p>As time went, real estate prices soared, and with the Fed loaning money out at low interest rates (supported by Bush and his &#8220;ownership society&#8221; policy), that created a real estate pricing bubble.</p>
<p>And when people started noticing this was a bad thing, it was Democrats who were able to prevent the GOP from making changes, because the GOP only had a small majority in the Senate, and a slightly larger majority in the House. And Democrats like Dodd and Frank, who had very cosy relationships with the banking industry, prevented any action that could have tempered the coming realignment by addressing it sooner.</p>
<p>So, it is pure, unfettered ignorance to simply blame it on Bush, or even wholly on the Democrats.</p>
<p>The problem was caused by government intervention into the market, which caused a significant distortion of risk, and fueled by bad Fed policy caused an unstable bubble that when it popped, ravaged the financial sector of the economy. And that had a very large ripple effect over the rest of the economy.</p>
<p>So, this is the type of occurrence we refer to when we conservatives say that government is the problem, not the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can a finance company have my tax return garnished or taken away? by Dre</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Dre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/can-a-finance-company-have-my-tax-return-garnished-or-taken-away/108/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Do you have bad credits? have your bank turn you down? trustedloan is the answer, they are  reputable loan company that offers  secured and unsecured loans, long term loans to both individual or organization.
We await your reply as your loan will be approved and secured,upon reply to this you&#039;ll be forwarded a Loan Application Form to Fill and return to us for we will also give you guide to receiving your loan...

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.Denise Brown
(GMD) Trustedloan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have bad credits? have your bank turn you down? trustedloan is the answer, they are  reputable loan company that offers  secured and unsecured loans, long term loans to both individual or organization.<br />
We await your reply as your loan will be approved and secured,upon reply to this you&#8217;ll be forwarded a Loan Application Form to Fill and return to us for we will also give you guide to receiving your loan&#8230;</p>
<p>FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:<br />
Mr.Denise Brown<br />
(GMD) Trustedloan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How does a virus get your online banking info? by Just Ask Gemalto</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-does-a-virus-get-your-online-banking-info/274/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Ask Gemalto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-does-a-virus-get-your-online-banking-info/274/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Online criminals often phish you for your information or use keyboard monitoring malware to &quot;listen&quot; to what you type into your keyboard while visiting certain websites. Change your passwords regularly and keep your anti-virus and anti-spyware software up to date so as to avoid criminals downloading malware software that can read what you are typing on your keyboard.

For more on this subject, see also, &quot;How do I choose a good password?&quot; and &quot;Are passwords safe?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online criminals often phish you for your information or use keyboard monitoring malware to &#8220;listen&#8221; to what you type into your keyboard while visiting certain websites. Change your passwords regularly and keep your anti-virus and anti-spyware software up to date so as to avoid criminals downloading malware software that can read what you are typing on your keyboard.</p>
<p>For more on this subject, see also, &#8220;How do I choose a good password?&#8221; and &#8220;Are passwords safe?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How does a banking work? by src50</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-does-a-banking-work/298/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>src50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-does-a-banking-work/298/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Read this book: &quot;Personal Finance For Dummies.&quot;  It has all sorts of info such as what you&#039;re asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this book: &#8220;Personal Finance For Dummies.&#8221;  It has all sorts of info such as what you&#8217;re asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do I get my finance to stop swearing? by src50</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-do-i-get-my-finance-to-stop-swearing/140/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>src50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-do-i-get-my-finance-to-stop-swearing/140/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>&quot;Fiance&quot;, not &quot;finance.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fiance&#8221;, not &#8220;finance.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do conservative explain the failure of the housing market &amp; banking system during Bush presidency? by Dr UrgentCare</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr UrgentCare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-do-conservative-explain-the-failure-of-the-housing-market-banking-system-during-bush-presidency/296/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Both Bush and Clinton before him warned the Congress to stop promoting and pushing the subprime loan program.  Many senators and representatives insisted the FDIC, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac continue to force banks to make the loans to people who couldn&#039;t afford them and to guarantee those loans so the banks would feel at less risk making them against their better judgement.  When all the bad loans came due and people couldn&#039;t afford to pay them, the bottom fell out of the market and caused our terrible current economy.

This all started more than a decade ago with the Community Reinvestment Act and can&#039;t be blamed on Bush or Clinton, but on the liberal, socialist leaning members of Congress who enacted it.  Here is a referrence:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Community Reinvestment Act (or CRA, Pub.L. 95-128, title VIII, 91 Stat. 1147, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.) is a United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.[1][2][3] Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.[4][5]  

Sometimes &quot;fairness&quot; is not a good thing, especially when it&#039;s forced on us and on business.  It&#039;s ruined the entire economy this time, harming many individuals, families and businesses.  Giving mortgages to people who can&#039;t afford to pay them back, just to be &quot;fair&quot;, is what has caused the current economic crisis.

Those Senators that were paid kickbacks and given great favors and gifts to keep the subprime loan program going despite the warnings that it would eventually ruin the economy are more to blame than others.  The top three Senator recipients of the most pay offs are Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barack Obama.

So think twice when you hear the White House say they &quot;inherited&quot; this economic crisis.  The current administration actually help to cause it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Bush and Clinton before him warned the Congress to stop promoting and pushing the subprime loan program.  Many senators and representatives insisted the FDIC, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac continue to force banks to make the loans to people who couldn&#8217;t afford them and to guarantee those loans so the banks would feel at less risk making them against their better judgement.  When all the bad loans came due and people couldn&#8217;t afford to pay them, the bottom fell out of the market and caused our terrible current economy.</p>
<p>This all started more than a decade ago with the Community Reinvestment Act and can&#8217;t be blamed on Bush or Clinton, but on the liberal, socialist leaning members of Congress who enacted it.  Here is a referrence:</p>
<p>From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br />
The Community Reinvestment Act (or CRA, Pub.L. 95-128, title VIII, 91 Stat. 1147, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.) is a United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.[1][2][3] Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.[4][5]  </p>
<p>Sometimes &#8220;fairness&#8221; is not a good thing, especially when it&#8217;s forced on us and on business.  It&#8217;s ruined the entire economy this time, harming many individuals, families and businesses.  Giving mortgages to people who can&#8217;t afford to pay them back, just to be &#8220;fair&#8221;, is what has caused the current economic crisis.</p>
<p>Those Senators that were paid kickbacks and given great favors and gifts to keep the subprime loan program going despite the warnings that it would eventually ruin the economy are more to blame than others.  The top three Senator recipients of the most pay offs are Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barack Obama.</p>
<p>So think twice when you hear the White House say they &#8220;inherited&#8221; this economic crisis.  The current administration actually help to cause it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How much will i be paying the finance company for auto loan?How to calculate it? by ugiidriver</title>
		<link>http://financeshop.info/how-much-will-i-be-paying-the-finance-company-for-auto-loanhow-to-calculate-it/180/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>ugiidriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financeshop.info/how-much-will-i-be-paying-the-finance-company-for-auto-loanhow-to-calculate-it/180/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Plug your numbers in here... 

But dude, if you can&#039;t do better than 24.5%, you should just ride a bike until you can save most of the price of the car!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plug your numbers in here&#8230; </p>
<p>But dude, if you can&#8217;t do better than 24.5%, you should just ride a bike until you can save most of the price of the car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
